https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350 --- Comment #42 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- Let me point at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries In case there are questions, please ask! [...] And: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires In particular: | When explicit library Requires are necessary, explicit library | dependencies should typically be arch-specific (unless the packages | involved are noarch) and there should be a spec file comment justifying it: That's why I mentioned this part of the packaging guidelines. The explanation _why_ there are explicit Requires needs to be added to the spec file as a comment. [...] When providing updated packages, please add a bugzilla comment with valid "Spec URL:" and "SRPM URL:" fields as you've done at the top of this ticket. Then give "fedora-review -b 808350" a try. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mUPR7XFuWm&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review