[Bug 996232] Review Request: pocl - Portable Computing Language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996232



--- Comment #20 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> ---
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures


> Name:     pocl
> Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}

> %package devel
> Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package


> %post -p /sbin/ldconfig
> %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig

Not needed. No shared libs in there.


> %files libs
> %{_libdir}/pocl/

> %files devel
> %{_libdir}/libpoclu.so
> %{_libdir}/libpocl.so
> %{_libdir}/pocl/llvmopencl.so

As one can see, the llvmopencl.so library is included in both packages. In
-libs because of including the full %{_libdir}/pocl/ tree, and in -devel as
specific file.

What .so file is it? Due to its private path, it smells like a plug-in
(extension module) rather than a lib needed at build-time. I assume it's
misplaced if included in the -devel package. Please investigate. ;-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tAYHeRmzG6&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]