https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995864 --- Comment #4 from Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #3) > What I don't understand is why the Python subpackages don't use %?_isa? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package > > $ rpm -qR python-liblinear|grep -v ^rpm > liblinear = 1.93-1.fc19 > python(abi) = 2.7 > > The Python module strictly needs the arch-specific lib using a specific > SONAME. Thanks for the hint, Michael! Didn't mind that, unfortunately. :( Fixed in updated spec-file below. ##### Changelog: * Mon Aug 12 2013 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> - 1.93-2 - build arched python-plugins - nuke hashbang from python-plugins * Sun Aug 11 2013 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> - 1.93-1 - Initial rpm release Urls: Spec URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/liblinear.spec SRPM URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/liblinear-1.93-2.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xXfCWKxUyX&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review