https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(bugs.michael@gmx. | |net) | --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- Amazing. It's really assigned to me already, but doesn't show up anywhere in my reviews folder. [...] In the build.log: > sh: epstopdf: command not found Many times. Adding that tool as BR doesn't seem to change anything. $ repoquery --whatprovides /usr/bin/epstopdf texlive-epstopdf-bin-3:svn18336.0-0.1.20130608_r30832.fc19.noarch texlive-epstopdf-bin-2:svn18336.0-22.20130427_r30134.fc19.noarch There's a PDF in the -doc package, which contains: $ cat refman.pdf Warning:\ the\ PDF\ reference\ manual\ (/builddir/build/BUILD/opentrep-0.5.3/doc/latex/refman.pdf)\ has\ failed\ to\ build.\ You\ can\ perform\ a\ simple\ re-build\ (make\ in\ the\ doc/latex\ sub-directory). [...] > opentrep-devel-0.5.3-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm > /bin/sh > pkgconfig The /bin/sh is for a shell-script: -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/opentrep-config It contains a hardcoded libdir path and therefore is not multilib-installable. One common way to fix it is to make the script retrieve variables from the pkgconfig file: $ pkg-config --variable=libdir opentrep /usr/lib64 [...] > opentrep-0.5.3-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm > > -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/pyopentrep Same here (not multilib-installable) and more. It appends /usr/lib64 to sys.path in an attempt at finding libpyopentrep, but that won't work as expected. The needed *.so lib is stored in the optional -devel package: $ pyopentrep Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pyopentrep", line 286, in <module> import libpyopentrep ImportError: No module named libpyopentrep With this run-time requirement, it would be plausible to move libpyopentrep.so into the base package, too. Even cleaner would be to store it in Python's search path for modules, so appending to sys.path would not be needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6Nel6JdHEi&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review