Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Workflow - Simple, flexible system to implement workflows Alias: perl-Workflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231758 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-17 12:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Your package is requiring perl(Data::UUID). This seems to be problematic which > is why I filtered the requirement from my version. > The license.txt for Data::UUID states: > > "The license under which this code was originally released is unknown, although > its release has been interpreted as its release under an open source license. > Attempts to contact the original author are underway. -- rjbs, 2006-11-14" > > I'd suggest you do filter that requirement as it is optional according to the > readme. Alternatively, review my package. :D Less work for you. Data::UUID I didn't worry about too much -- it's in extras, so presumptively the license is OK. If a package license is under question, then a bug should be filed, an audit conducted, etc; otherwise I'm going to trust, in good faith, the reviewer, packager, and "rjbs" :) got it right. > About the docs, I solved that problem by just running tar and gzip on the > example file and packaging that tar.gz file. Yeah, I've never actually been a fan of that... if the docs are too large to reasonably keep with the base package, then a -docs subpackage is in order. The point is well taken though -- looking back at the package, it's ~400k installed, ~220k of which is %doc. So, that's a large percentage of the package taken up by %doc, but still a fairly small amount of disk space overall. I could easily be talked into splitting them out into -docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review