[Bug 994474] Review Request: python-qrencode - Python wrapper for the qrencode library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994474



--- Comment #5 from Marcel Haerry <mh+fedora@xxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #4)
>     $ rpmls -p python-qrencode-1.01-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 
> (!) -rwxr-xr-x  /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/qr_encode.so

Sorry, I'm not really sure I understand correctly what you mean with that. Can
you elaborate a little bit more?

As I said this is my first package and I don't fully understand what is meant
with private library. Thanks.

As far as I understood qr_encode.so is an internal library that should not be
advertised as being provided by the package. However, it does not do that in my
opinion:

$ rpm -q --provides -p RPMS/python-qrencode-1.01-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 
python-qrencode = 1.01-1.fc20
python-qrencode(x86-64) = 1.01-1.fc20
$ 

And it's definitely not requiring it:


$ rpm -q --requires -p
RPMS/python-qrencode-1.01-1.fc20.x86_64.rpmlibc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit)
libqrencode.so.3()(64bit)
python(abi) = 2.7
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
$

But I think it definitely should be part of the package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7OknvfR4vu&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]