Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-17 11:19 EST ------- OK - Mock Build on FC-6 FC-Devel (i386) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License is GPL OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 4343ff1521dfd8c524428f707e7c3068 pypar2-1.3.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant. OK - patch0 is applied correctly and work. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - rpmlint output are clean on RPM and SRPM files. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version -------------------------- Installed package -------------------------- OK - .desktop file is correct and work. OK - GTK front-end start with no error. OK - All buttom from front-end work properly. Ok - Files associations is proper. -------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review