[Bug 961237] Review Request: sipxtapi - SIP stack and real-time media framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961237



--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Yes, because you give us a template, we can also refuse to review your package,
who knows exactly the content is.

First glimpse at spec:

1. Drop

Vendor: SIPfoundry
Packager: Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2. It's better to add --disable-static to the configure.

3. Why providing a libs subpackage? Can't it be merged into main package?

4. I don't hope you include "test" in the version field.

5. I'm sorry in the past years I never use Group tag, and you use Group:
Development/Libraries in 2 different subpackages, I think it's not perfect,
recommend dropping it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lFYoH2AGTC&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]