Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Observable - Allow other classes and objects to respond to events in yours https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232612 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-16 23:06 EST ------- The construct: %if "%fedora" >= "7" BuildRequires: perl-devel %endif Is highly non-portable, and indeed, causes the package to fail to rebuild even on Fedora machines if %fedora hasn't been defined somewhere. With the still-being-worked-through perl/perl-devel split, the preferred (well, to me at least) and, more importantly, portable way of pulling in perl-devel is to have a buildrequires on the module used to handle the build. In this case, we're in a standard Makefile.PL situation, so adding a buildrequires against perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) will be both portable and cause perl-devel to be pulled in. Replace the conditional with a BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) and I'll approve the package. + source files match upstream: a4fe8e71f0082e51d5d97da865b6a708 Class-Observable-1.04.tar.gz a4fe8e71f0082e51d5d97da865b6a708 ../Class-Observable-1.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly O noarch -- no debuginfo package + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: == provides perl(Class::Observable) perl-Class-Observable = 1.04-1.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Class::ISA) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=39, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.14 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review