https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992940 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- rpmlint output: perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dev -> deb, derv, div perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exe -> ex, exes, exec perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dev -> deb, derv, div perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exe -> ex, exes, exec perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. provides: perl(Syntax::Feature::Junction) = 0.003004 perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction) = 0.003004 perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction::All) = 0.003004 perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction::Any) = 0.003004 perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction::Base) = 0.003004 perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction::None) = 0.003004 perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction::One) = 0.003004 perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction = 0.003004-1.fc20 requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) perl(Sub::Exporter::Progressive) >= 0.001006 perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction) perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction::All) perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction::Any) perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction::Base) perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction::None) perl(Syntax::Keyword::Junction::One) perl(base) perl(if) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 review checklist: - rpmlint ok; the html and http acronyms could be capitalized but it's no blocker - package and spec naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is (GPL+ or Artistic), same as upstream and OK for Fedora - license text is bundled and packaged - spec file written in English and is legible - source matches upstream - package builds fine in Rawhide - build dependencies fully specified - no locale data to worry about - no libraries to worry about - no bundled code present - package is not intended to be relocatable - directory ownership OK - no duplicate files - permissions OK - macro usage is consistent - package is code, not content - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - no devel bits to worry about - not a GUI app, no desktop file needed - filenames are all ASCII Nits: Should BR: at least version 0.88 of Test::More due to use of done_testing in t/syntax.t APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zaBkFm5jOV&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review