[Bug 870853] Review Request: haven - Next Generation Backup System

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870853



--- Comment #7 from Davide Benini <dbenini@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)

Hi Christopher,

> 1. Why not nameing it safehaven but haven?

To be aligned with upstream name.

> 2. %define _hardened_build 1

I've made the suggested change to the spec file:

Spec URL: http://www.dbenini.com/haven/fedora/haven.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.dbenini.com/haven/fedora/haven-0.0.2-7.fc19.src.rpm

* Koji scratch build info:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5776199

> 3. Can you ask upstream to avoid using 
> 
> %global _configure ../../configure
> mkdir -p build/standard build/gtkgui build/full
> cd build/standard 
> %configure --disable-ext2fs --disable-gmime --without-postgresql?
> 
> I think this is not cmake, why should we burden ourselves?

I will get in touch with upstream about this.

> 4. I think you should add requires of main package for all subpackages.
> 
> 5. Once you've done the 4, you should remove subpackages'

There is no main package, see previous comments.

> 6. You shouldn't create a new tarball when the download URL is available.

Could you please elaborate this one?

Thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=buLrGQrLSd&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]