https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984321 --- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3) > (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > > Description isn't very useful, unless one knows what "Powerline" is. > ACK. > > I guess it's not what the term "Powerline" is commonly in everyday language > in Germany: A synonym for PowerLAN (i.e. Ethernet over power lines) > http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:Powerline_Communication Hm, maybe, I'm not sure if this can confusion. I actually meant something different: in the original description, we have "This is the next version of Powerline", "aims to resolve some of the “unsolvable” problems of the vim-script implementation", which are only meaningful to a person who knows what this previous implementation does, and what it did wrong. I think that "powerline" as a name is OK. It doesn't have to be meaningful, just reasonably unique to distinguish the program from other programs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eGqhUg8sBZ&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review