https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983778 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> --- Sorry for leaving you alone here. I'm finally back and here is my REVIEW: * First of all please add "%global debug_package %{nil}" to the top of the package. This is a typical Erlang shortcoming - an arch-independent data is installed into arch-dependent directory, so you can't mark it as noarch but must disable bogus debuginfo subpackage generation. We (me with my fellow colleague from SUSE community) are working on it. * Second - please manually specify a list of Requires. It still can't be calculated automatically so you have to trust me here (we're working on an automatic dependency calculation): Requires: erlang-erts%{?_isa} >= R14B Requires: erlang-stdlib%{?_isa} * You may drop "BuildRequires: erlang-eunit" - it's one of the erlang-rebar explicit requirements (and will be in the future). Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + rpmlint is not silent but all its messages are either failse positives or can be ignored safely: sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-jsx-1.4.2-1.fc20.ppc.rpm ../SRPMS/erlang-jsx-1.4.2-1.fc20.src.rpm erlang-jsx.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) evented -> evened, vented, e vented erlang-jsx.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) json -> son, j son erlang-jsx.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US json -> son, j son erlang-jsx.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yajl -> yawl ^^^ False positives. erlang-jsx.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-jsx.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ^^^ that's normal for Erlang-related packages (as I explained above due to known shortcomings we have to install noarch data into arch-dependent directory). erlang-jsx.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) evented -> evened, vented, e vented erlang-jsx.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) json -> son, j son erlang-jsx.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US json -> son, j son erlang-jsx.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yajl -> yawl ^^^ False positives. erlang-jsx.src:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 10) ^^^ Cosmetic. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (MIT license, as stated in the sources). + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum v1.4.2.tar.gz* a7a1c32c7445d9f7515ef35cafb471c13cbd2f0abd61a0596c7ef4bee0583d56 v1.4.2.tar.gz a7a1c32c7445d9f7515ef35cafb471c13cbd2f0abd61a0596c7ef4bee0583d56 v1.4.2.tar.gz.1 sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please fix issues I noted above and I'll finish this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yN5ImFuSpP&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review