Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225924 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-16 13:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) ... > * license is open source-compatible. > - use acronyms for licences where common > OK, license field should probably remove the 2.0 due to rpmlint errors Done > X summary should be more than just the package name Fixed > * rpmlint on <this package>.srpm gives no output > - justify warnings if you think they shouldn't be there > rpmlint jakarta-commons-daemon-1.0.1-6jpp.2.src.rpm > W: jakarta-commons-daemon non-standard-group System/Boot > W: jakarta-commons-daemon invalid-license Apache Software License 2.0 > > the 2.0 in the license can probably be removed to get rid of the warning Done > * summary should be a short and concise description of the package > X summary is just package name Fixed > rpmlint jakarta-commons-daemon-1.0.1-6jpp.2.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: jakarta-commons-daemon non-standard-group System/Boot > W: jakarta-commons-daemon invalid-license Apache Software License 2.0 > X the 2.0 can probably be removed from the License field Done > > rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-mwringe/result/jakarta-commons-daemon-javadoc-1.0.1-6jpp.2.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: jakarta-commons-daemon-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation > W: jakarta-commons-daemon-javadoc invalid-license Apache Software License 2.0 > W: jakarta-commons-daemon-javadoc dangerous-command-in-%post rm > W: jakarta-commons-daemon-javadoc dangerous-command-in-%postun rm > X don't have rm in the javadoc post and postun Done New spec file checked into cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review