[Bug 960645] Review Request: sanewall - A powerful firewall builder

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960645

Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |susi.lehtola@xxxxxx



--- Comment #3 from Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola@xxxxxx> ---
IMO this package could replace firehol in Fedora; the last release of Firehol
was 5 years ago and it needs systemd support and so on. If this package gains
EPEL support, I'll be happy to review it and mark firehol dead.

**

The
 Conflicts: firehol
is incorrect - the packages can peacefully coexist on a system.

**

What's the source for SOURCE1? Has the file been sent upstream?

**

The list in the %description should IMHO be written in the form

Sanewall can be used for almost any firewall need, including:
* control of any number of internal/external/virtual interfaces
* control of any combination of routed traffic
* setting up DMZ routers and servers
* all kinds of NAT
* providing strong protection (flooding, spoofing, etc.)
* transparent caches
* source MAC verification
* blacklists, whitelists

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iPKbstykXW&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]