https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751411 --- Comment #12 from Veaceslav Mindru <mindruv@xxxxxxxxx> --- The same applies here >%install >rm -rf "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25install_section Removal of %{buildroot} is no longer necessary, except for EPEL 5. >%install >rm -rf "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" > >install -D src/import.sh "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_bindir/import.sh" > >mkdir -p "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%homedir/" >cp -a src/bash-modules/* "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%homedir/" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Statically_Linking_Executables Static linkage is a special exception and should be decided on a case-by-case basis. The packager must provide rationale for linking statically, including precedences where available, to FESCO for approval. If you link statically against a library, add yourself to the initialcc list for the library so you can watch for any security issues or bug fixes for which you'd want to rebuild your package against a new version of the library. Here are instructions for making that request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gYQwWcMl5N&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review