[Bug 870853] Review Request: haven - Next Generation Backup System

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870853

Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> ---
I'll take an informal review.

1. Why not nameing it safehaven but haven?

2. %define _hardened_build 1

should be

%global _hardened_build 1

3. Can you ask upstream to avoid using 

%global _configure ../../configure
mkdir -p build/standard build/gtkgui build/full
cd build/standard 
%configure --disable-ext2fs --disable-gmime --without-postgresql?

I think this is not cmake, why should we burden ourselves?

4. I think you should add requires of main package for all subpackages.

5. Once you've done the 4, you should remove subpackages'

%doc README COPYING

As these doc should only present one time in main package.

6. You shouldn't create a new tarball when the download URL is available.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vhr5TKL1HQ&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]