[Bug 989014] Review Request: jdf-stacks-client - JBoss Stacks Parser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014

--- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan <gerard@xxxxxxx> ---
Thanks for the review! :)

(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> Problem(s):
> [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
> file
>      from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
> please, can ask if upstream to include license text file?

Done. I've created a PR on Github to include it:
https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jdf-stacks-client/pull/5

> [!]: Latest version is packaged.
> https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jdf-stacks-client/archive/1.0.2.CR2.tar.gz 
> is available, consider upgrading 

I haven't packaged 1.0.2.CR2 because I think CR2 is probably considered a
pre-release. Since I don't need anything specifically from the pre-release, I
think having the latest 'Final'/stable is better for now. When 1.0.2.Final is
released, I'll be sure to update to that :)

> why dont use
> https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jdf-stacks-client/archive/1.0.1.Final.tar.gz ?
> regards

I've done it this way because of the recommendations for using github tarballs
as sources.

See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZWjgpwEDrM&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]