[Bug 979738] Review Request: crawl-sdl - free roguelike game of exploration and treasure-hunting in dungeons

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979738

--- Comment #9 from Nazar Mishturak <nazar@xxxxxx> ---
Does license tag apply only to binaries and files included in package?
Because this is what licence.txt says(#my comment):

Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup
Copyright 1997-2013 Linley Henzell, the dev team, and the contributors
(please refer to CREDITS.txt for details).

This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.

Certain pieces come with different licenses, all compatible with the GPL.
These include:
* 3-clause BSD: MSVC/stdint.h # Microsoft Visual Studio C99 hack, not compiled
* 2-clause BSD: all contributions by Steve Noonan and Jesse Luehrs # probably
included in binary
* Public Domain|CC0: most of tiles, perlin.cc, perlin.h # tiles in datadir
* MIT: json.cc/json.h, some .js files in webserver/static/scripts/contrib/
       worley.{cc,h} # webserver part of crawl, allows to host a game online,
not in this package
* zlib: webserver/static/scripts/contrib/inflate.js # same thing

Should I remove some of licenses from License tag using licence.txt file or
follow licensecheck output?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jogbMeyHAy&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]