https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980960 --- Comment #15 from Ed Santiago <santiago@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > Not a big issue, but: There is nothing wrong with requiring > /usr/bin/xsltproc. It is more accurate than depending on a package name. The > executable could move, for example. Thank you. That does seem like the right thing to do, since it removes a potentially confusing (and fragile) level of indirection. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PBuGQ2Hpx7&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review