https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986630 --- Comment #2 from Eric Smith <spacewar@xxxxxxxxx> --- What is the rationale for issues 1 and 2? Is there some Fedora policy regarding github vs. pypi that I've overlooked? For issue 1, the URL I provide seems to be much closer to a "home page" for the project than the github page, provides a superset of the information on the github page, and provides a link to the github page. It seems like a more useful URL for users of the package. In fact, that's the page that pypi says is the home page. For issue 2, the release tarballs on github seem to be upstream from pypi, so they seem like a better candidate to be considered authoritative. Although pypi does appear to offer older versions, they aren't listed, while on github they are. This means that the using the github release URL for the Source makes it easier for someone maintaining the spec to look at the version history and find older or newer versions. Also, the github release page gives a portion of the hash useful to identify the correct sources in git. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LevrGn0k4S&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review