https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962251 --- Comment #8 from Dan Callaghan <dcallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #7) > I assume you mean "xml2-devel"? Yeah I am planning to improve that. > Eventually I would also like cabal-rpm to support updating of packages > but that is a bit more complicated. > > For now you can use cabal-rpm-diff (cblrpm-diff) to compare your > spec file to what cblrpm would generate. So yeah it is a manual > process - I usually use a merge tool to merge changes from .spec.cblrpm > to .spec. But removing the comments just adds to the diff. :) > We generally try to stay close to the cblrpm output. Yes quite right, I have left the comments and whitespace as is to make the diffs easier to read. Thanks for the tip about cabal-rpm-diff too (I was just running cabal-rpm, overwriting the .spec, and then using git diff... ultimately the same thing I guess). > Suggestions for improving the Summary and Description output > are welcome - in this case not sure how cblrpm could do better. :) Yeah I don't think there is any way cabal-rpm could do better with the description/summary, if the upstream one isn't exactly suitable for Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xSaR8TObs9&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review