[Bug 231746] Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231746





------- Additional Comments From opensource@xxxxxxxxx  2007-03-14 15:43 EST -------
(In reply to comment #47)

>  Is 5(symlinks) really an issue? Why would someone install ettercap-common
> without ettercap or ettercap-gtk?

You get the situation when you install ettercap and then deinstall it, because
ettercap-common is left when you do not add a Requires: ettercap-version-release

(In reply to comment #45)
> MUSTFIX: [1] - Timestamp of original file is not preserved in the src.rpm;
> please use wget -N ( or similar tool ) to fix that;the timestamp of the man
> pages is not preserved either

Afaik are the manpages gziped by rpm, this will always change the man pages
except to gzip them first. Is preserving the timestap for man pages really
neccessary?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]