https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974737 --- Comment #6 from Eduardo Echeverria <echevemaster@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #4) > Hmmm, there's only this relevant piece: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing > there are some reason for svni-vim not to depend of svni? i think that svni-vim isn't be should an independent package, therefore, the installation of the subpackage will install the documentation contained in the base package. > There's no requirement for [sub]packages to depend on optional -doc > subpackages. Unless it's the case as explained in above guideline. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PNwdX0NsJv&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review