https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982077 --- Comment #6 from Eduardo Echeverria <echevemaster@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Matthias, with respect to the licenses, you're right.(I'm sorry I didn't checked thoroughly) there are a mix of those. althought the file LICENSE contains the boilerplate of the 3-clause BSD, that we can check with: ➜ django-ckeditor-4.0.2 licensecheck -r LICENSE LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) so the license field would look like that License: BSD and (GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ or MPLv1.1) and MIT and ASL 2.0 Marcelo, in this cases the packager should stick at the licensing guidelines, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios In these cases, this would be a clear indication that be is incurring in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries, but Fedora does not require client-side JavaScript to be unbundled in this moment. Please review this too : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #5) > > For the included ckeditor it's an OR: GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ or MPLv1.1 Thanks for the clarification Here you go the updated files, marcelo, try again ;) SPEC: http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/python-django-ckeditor/2/python-django-ckeditor.spec SRPM: http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/python-django-ckeditor/2/python-django-ckeditor-4.0.2-2.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oxP3aUm5WH&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review