https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972943 --- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Kashyap Chamarthy from comment #14) [cut] > (1) Lincences > > Unknown or generated > -------------------- > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/lpf- > 46ae0c3b2791013a2b5b1d03137538b9bc906350/scripts/build_error.py > > /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/lpf- > 46ae0c3b2791013a2b5b1d03137538b9bc906350/scripts/update.py Even if these files are not marked properly, the overall licensing situation for this package should be clear form the README and the LICENSE file IMHO. If you insist, I can patch the files. However, I've approved some packages myself containing files with these licenses since I havn't found anything in the guidelines which says I shouldn't in cases like this?! > (2) No %check? Unit tests are on the todo-list but yet not in place. Is %check required in the guidelines? > (3) Rationale for the non-standard-dir-perm (from rpmlint errors) Because user modifies files owned by the lpg user pkg-build using group permissions, the 775 permissions is needed to allow this. There's some more in the README on this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MrBBsJ0V3h&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review