https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981812 --- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen <jamielinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end I'd probably go for the hyphen or space. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. Some failing tests, and for some reason I'm getting a segfault (building on rawhide within mock plus the other two packages). Render 1) getTile() override format getTile() 2) validates getTile() with XML string 3) validates 27 passing (809 ms) 3 failing 1) Render getTile() override format: Uncaught Error: Command failed: inf at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:637:15) at ChildProcess.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:98:17) at maybeClose (child_process.js:735:16) at Socket.<anonymous> (child_process.js:948:11) at Socket.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:95:17) at Pipe.close (net.js:466:12) 2) Render getTile() validates: Uncaught Error: Command failed: inf at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:637:15) at ChildProcess.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:98:17) at maybeClose (child_process.js:735:16) at Socket.<anonymous> (child_process.js:948:11) at Socket.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:95:17) at Pipe.close (net.js:466:12) 3) Render getTile() with XML string validates: Uncaught Error: Command failed: 66.4212 at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:637:15) at ChildProcess.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:98:17) at maybeClose (child_process.js:735:16) at Socket.<anonymous> (child_process.js:948:11) at Socket.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:95:17) at Pipe.close (net.js:466:12) /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rA4zNH: line 32: 7138 Segmentation fault NODE_PATH=lib /usr/lib/node_modules/mocha/bin/mocha -R spec ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: nodejs-tilelive-mapnik-0.5.0-1.fc20.noarch.rpm nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backend -> backed, back end, back-end nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Renderer -> Tenderer, Rendered, Render er nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks, j nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/step /usr/lib/node_modules/step nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/generic-pool /usr/lib/node_modules/generic-pool nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/sphericalmercator /usr/lib/node_modules/sphericalmercator nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/mapnik /usr/lib/node_modules/mapnik nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/mime /usr/lib/node_modules/mime nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/underscore /usr/lib/node_modules/underscore 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint nodejs-tilelive-mapnik nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backend -> backed, back end, back-end nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Renderer -> Tenderer, Rendered, Render er nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks, j nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/step /usr/lib/node_modules/step nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/generic-pool /usr/lib/node_modules/generic-pool nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/sphericalmercator /usr/lib/node_modules/sphericalmercator nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/mapnik /usr/lib/node_modules/mapnik nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/mime /usr/lib/node_modules/mime nodejs-tilelive-mapnik.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/tilelive-mapnik/node_modules/underscore /usr/lib/node_modules/underscore 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- nodejs-tilelive-mapnik (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): nodejs(engine) npm(generic-pool) npm(mapnik) npm(mime) npm(sphericalmercator) npm(step) npm(underscore) Provides -------- nodejs-tilelive-mapnik: nodejs-tilelive-mapnik npm(tilelive-mapnik) Source checksums ---------------- http://registry.npmjs.org/tilelive-mapnik/-/tilelive-mapnik-0.5.0.tgz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : cf7397338a047e14454f9ec67000319c46f6869e6dc97dd008b320098dd79941 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : cf7397338a047e14454f9ec67000319c46f6869e6dc97dd008b320098dd79941 Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -r -n nodejs-tilelive-mapnik-0.5.0-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wCrs1erF8v&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review