[Bug 927458] Review Request: rospack - ROS package and stack tools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927458

Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx
                   |                            |m
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx
                   |                            |m
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5579716

$ rpmlint -i -v *
rospack.src: I: checking
rospack.src: I: checking-url http://www.ros.org/wiki/rospack (timeout 10
seconds)
rospack.src: I: checking-url
https://github.com/ros/rospack/archive/671c3cb620147308df42a025cab082669efc96ff/rospack-2.0.13-671c3cb.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
rospack.i686: I: checking
rospack.i686: I: checking-url http://www.ros.org/wiki/rospack (timeout 10
seconds)
rospack.i686: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/librospack.so librospack.so
The soname of the library is neither of the form lib<libname>.so.<major> or
lib<libname>-<major>.so.

rospack.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

rospack.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rosstack
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

rospack.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rospack
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

rospack.x86_64: I: checking
rospack.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.ros.org/wiki/rospack (timeout 10
seconds)
rospack.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/librospack.so librospack.so
The soname of the library is neither of the form lib<libname>.so.<major> or
lib<libname>-<major>.so.

rospack.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

rospack.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rosstack
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

rospack.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rospack
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

rospack-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
rospack-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://www.ros.org/wiki/rospack
(timeout 10 seconds)
rospack-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
rospack-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.ros.org/wiki/rospack
(timeout 10 seconds)
rospack-devel.i686: I: checking
rospack-devel.i686: I: checking-url http://www.ros.org/wiki/rospack (timeout 10
seconds)
rospack-devel.x86_64: I: checking
rospack-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.ros.org/wiki/rospack (timeout
10 seconds)
rospack.spec: I: checking-url
https://github.com/ros/rospack/archive/671c3cb620147308df42a025cab082669efc96ff/rospack-2.0.13-671c3cb.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings.


No man pages, no problem. But this has to be addressed:

rospack.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/librospack.so librospack.so
The soname of the library is neither of the form lib<libname>.so.<major> or
lib<libname>-<major>.so.

If this is no public library, you have to filter it from the Provides list. See
also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#invalid-soname.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=R1zI1wLtcR&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]