https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980934 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> --- * People are sponsored, packages are not. ;) * This request is not really a dupe of bug 879881, because this one packages the plug-in for GStreamer 1.x whereas the other ticket has been for the GStreamer 0.10.x code. * Just pointing out: the other packages for GStreamer 1.x use the "gstreamer1-" prefix. Depending on interest in still packaging the 0.10.x plug-in, this one could keep its src.rpm %name, but build both gstreamer1-omx and gstreamer-omx binary rpms. Currently it blocks the gstreamer-omx name. Of course, if the 0.10.x plugin ever were to be built, it could be packaged separately as gstreamer0-omx or such. I just feel it's necessary to mention the inconsistency. > License: LGPLv2+ Rather "LGPLv2". The preamble of all the source files does not contain the "or (at your option) any later version" phrase, but just the LGPL v2.1. Only scripts/files [generated ones, too] from the build framework refer to "any later version" (grep "at your option" * -R) -- and most of them are GPL'ed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MZ0qBPNjn7&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review