https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956931 --- Comment #25 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #24) > > Not all desktop environments that support SVG icons support them gzipped > (.svgz). Install the icon as plain uncompressed SVG. > > Please don't make suggestions for which there aren't packaging guidelines. > This one, imo, is unwise: > 1. DE's not supporting svgz is a DE failing/bug, not a packaging one (again, > until supported by guidelines saying so) Maybe I'm unwise, but the cited sentence comes from rpmlint directly. I don't know which messages from our best checking tool are serious, and which ones are just blurb and not useful. Good to know that we are now sure to have another message which belongs to the latter group :) OK, then leave the svgz icon as is. BTW, this senseless message from rpmlint is worth to be reported as a bug. > 2. any desktop that doesn't support svg, should fallback to unscalable > icons (and if they don't, again, it's a DE failing/bug, not a packaging > problem). The question is, does it make sense at all to use a KDE-related application launcher on a minimalistic desktop which doesn't support SVG? We shouldn't bother with problems which come up due to "patchwork" use of tools which are not intended for. An example from the "other side": The dockbar "Docky" is designed for Gnome, and the included folder viewer cannot be configured so that Dolphin will be opened. Means, the applet takes the file manager association from Gio, which is not directly configurable. Besides the lots of dependencies (including all the Mono stuff) it is not fully usable anyway, and this is not to be considered as a bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DoAOutntr1&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review