https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979668 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |panemade@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Review: + mock build is successful for f20 + rpmlint output on rpms gave 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm trball : efc22c4aa1fbe26112a53e4e637c7632b48ea429f2648cdb3207fc003e7540f9 upstream tarball : efc22c4aa1fbe26112a53e4e637c7632b48ea429f2648cdb3207fc003e7540f9 - License "GPLv2+ or Artistic" is NOT valid. I see its Artistic 1.0 + rest follows packaging guidelines + make test is successful with output All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.06 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.10 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-Entities-Interpolate-1.04-1.fc20 Provides: perl(HTML::Entities::Interpolate) = 1.04 perl-HTML-Entities-Interpolate = 1.04-1.fc20 Requires: perl(HTML::Entities) perl(Tie::Function) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) Get the license clarified with upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9sCz8z6ZFN&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review