https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927237 --- Comment #16 from Lorenzo Dalrio <lorenzo.dalrio@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Tomasz Torcz from comment #15) > 2) license file is a bit problematic. Most subpackages depend on "-libs", > and "-libs" carry COPYING, so this is fine. > "-fs", "-http" and "-ftpd" depend on "-server", "-server" depends on > "-libs", so fine again. > > We are left with "-tap", "-mon" and "-shell". Neither of those carry > separate License file (licensing details are described on a webpage, URL is > in spec). I don't believe we should invent license files, I can contact > upstream to resolve this issue. This shouldn't block the review, IMO. Unfortunately this one is blocking because we do not honor licensing guidelines. [1] However in this case we are permitted to duplicate license file for -tap -mon and -shell subpackages [2] [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Duplicate_Files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vQ5kHmvuhY&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review