https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977208 --- Comment #5 from Renich Bon Ciric <renich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Roman Mohr from comment #4) > It is better to name the tar.gz like %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz as in the > patch ( see point "Source0" in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ > How_to_create_an_RPM_package#SPEC_file_overview). Otherwise your tar.gz > might override other tar.gz's in your SOURCES directory which are also not > properly named. > > The patch works for me. Did you place the source tar.gz in your > ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES directory? Yes; I did. The thing is that the package should be named php-phalcon for 2 reasons: - Fedora frameworks and pecl libs are named php-<name> - The package is named cphalcon; but the project is called Phalcon. Believe me; I asked the author about it. So, your script works fine with cphalcon as a name. Not with php-phalcon as a name. > After patching the spec file I tested it with something like this: > > spectool -g php-phalcon.spec > mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --buildsrpm --spec=php-phalcon.spec > --sources=. --resultdir=. > mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --no-clean --no-cleanup-after --resultdir=. > php-phalcon-1.2.0-1.fc20.src.rpm I could've patched it wrongly. I did patch orig file.patch Thank you for your interest! ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=asoa1HwMgM&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review