https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927237 --- Comment #14 from Lorenzo Dalrio <lorenzo.dalrio@xxxxxxxxx> --- We have a couple of issues left: 1) rpmlint reports some unused direct shlib dependencies, please try to fix this if it is possible [1]: owfs-capi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libowcapi-2.9.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libusb-0.1.so.4 owfs-capi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libowcapi-2.9.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 owfs-capi.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libowcapi-2.9.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2 owfs-ownet.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libownet-2.9.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 2) we need to ship license file with every combination of subpackages installation. Subpackages that depend on a package that already installs license file are ok, standalone subpackages should install license file. [2] [3] 3) license file contains an incorrect fsf address [4], please ask upstream to update license file by picking a new copy from FSF. 4) Please fix permissions for this file, change it to 0755: owfs-python.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ow/_OW.so 0775L [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Duplicate_Files [4] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nDo3jEgkQK&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review