Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231746 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-13 15:30 EST ------- wrt to comment #28: If you want it so, I will not object. But being in the -common would be simpler and could/would explain the split. Plus it would not create conflicts between the tui-fedora-readme and gui-fedora-readme. As of doc requirements, we DO provide the common docs in the package which is ... surprise surprise... common. Given the split and the presence of docs in the -common package, I see no reason for the binary packages to contain anything but the specific man page(s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review