https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894413 --- Comment #22 from Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Marcel Wysocki from comment #20) > there seems to be an "srconly" tarball which does not bundle any libraries. > maybe we can work from there. Seems to be a good idea. (In reply to Marcin.Dulak from comment #21) > See bug #894413 comment #15 - i have a spec based on scronly working, it > just requires polishing. Another good point to start further process. > If nobody objects i will create a patch that is based on bug #894413 as orig > and incorporates my changes. OK, so just attach your patch to this bug, so we can start discussing about. > I have also a general comment for packaging: > we should profit from debian peoples work and original spec distributed > upstream by davmail (i based on it) and not try make one from scratch. There are some nice patches from debian avail, esp. unbundling libs.jar and removing unneeded libgrowl. I think starting a three-way-merge from existing spec, Marcin's spec and upstream's spec will give us some solid base to build-up from here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9eIvKjYl9e&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review