https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350 Daniel E. Wilson <danw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|BuildFails | --- Comment #33 from Daniel E. Wilson <danw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Updated package to use version 5.3.5 of Racket. Can be downloaded from the following URL: http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~danw/racket.spec http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~danw/racket-5.3.5-1.fc18.src.rpm I did make some the modifications that were suggested but not all of them. Those that I didn't implement seemed to not be a good idea in light of my interpretation of what the packaging guide had to say. For example, I am still using ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} because the guide is neutral on the issue provided that I am consistent about using ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} or the %{buildroot} macro. The same applies to the use of the %{_isa} macro which the guide does not also appear to recommend. I am leaving the debug_package macro where it is since there is a large comment explaining why it is there. I will naturally accept suggestions that will eliminate the need for that macro. I moved the the static libraries into a racket-static package because I have at times linked to static libraries during development of a program to make debugging easier. It is not intended that the static libraries would ever be used by anyone other than a developer and they should not be used in production code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Zs4R7jzksg&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review