https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976886 --- Comment #8 from Marcin.Dulak@xxxxxxxxx --- (In reply to Björn Esser from comment #6) > (In reply to Marcin.Dulak from comment #5) > > It's too much trouble to pre-build doc. We will rather look at povray > > alternatives, any suggestions? > > LuxRender might be a suitable substitute. It's GPLv3+, avail on F17+ and > EL5+ (through EPEL). Have a look here for more details: > http://www.luxrender.net/en_GB/description > > ##### ASE is LGPLv2+, so i believe i won't be able to use the pylux python API http://www.luxrender.net/wiki/API_Usage_example , i.e., have in ASE "import pylux"? However i found this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#Linking_and_multiple_licenses and now i'm not sure: is "import Y" possible in a X LGPL project, where Y is GPL? By they way pylux seems not packaged: bug #754945 > > You forgot to prefix the updated urls. :) `fedora-review` likes them > prefixed, so I repeat them with proper prefix here. in fact i did not include them on purpose - was asking myself a question if fedora-review will work without them - and i did for me. > > Spec URL: > http://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-ase/v03/python-ase.spec > SRPM URL: > http://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-ase/v03/python-ase-3.7.1. > 3184-3.fc20.src.rpm > > ##### > > I'll take next review-run tommorow morning. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O8yxfsNSLR&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review