https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973084 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Marcin.Dulak from comment #15) > > 's!BSD$!& with advertising!' > > the /usr/share/doc/htmlcleaner-2.2.1/licence.txt file > looks to me closer to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:BSD?rd=Licensing/BSD#3ClauseBSD > It's right that 13 files do not contain license header, but why > changing the license to "BSD with advertising"? You're right of course. The part about: | Neither the name of the <ORGANIZATION> nor the names of its contributors | may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software | without specific prior written permission got me on the wrong track... ;) Note: You possibly want to rename `licence.txt` to proper spelling, but that's up to you deciding about: %prep .... ln -f LICENSE licence.txt %doc LICENSE Your package is fine to be imported to SCM now! APPROVED! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8ndCgLcbmH&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review