https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975309 --- Comment #4 from Boris Kolpackov <boris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > > License: Boost > > This needs a closer look, because the file LICENSE contains the MIT terms, and > several source files mention MIT licensing, too. Here is the situation: most of the code in libcutl is MIT-licensed. However, also included is a small subset of Boost (essentially the Boost regex library), which is under the Boost license. While this is done to minimize dependencies, it is possible to ignore the internal Boost subset in libcutl and instead use the external libboost_regex library (the --with-external-boost configure option). I tend to think that the RPM should be built with the --with-external-boost option and then the license can probably be changed to MIT. Alternatively, the license should probably be MIT/Boost (the terms of these two licenses are very similar). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LqsZzbeVwM&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review