https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962651 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel+fdr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Praveen, Sorry for the delay, been busy with work. http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/bamf.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/bamf-0.3.6-3.fc19.src.rpm As for the license, it looks like the current license tags are already accurate. As explained in the comment above the first license field, libbamf contains some files that are marked GPL, so the combination of those with LGPL files are effectively under the GPL, not LGPL. I'll file a bug upstream, but is that alright if we get the review done and I'll make the license update as soon as update fixes them? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MpAXJinyg8&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review