https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971103 --- Comment #8 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Peter, (In reply to Peter Schiffer from comment #7) > Hi Douglas, > > ah yes, I know about this error and I've already checked it. In this case, > this shouldn't be a problem because the gid is not changed, the bsd-mailx > binary doesn't have suid and sgid flags. > > This error was introduced by 03-Base-fixes-2.patch. I don't think that it's > realy worthy expanding the for loop applying upstream patches for better > debugging things like this (which is probably only this one error, > considering the bsd-mailx is not actively developed any more). > I am sorry, I disagree. The spec should be always simple and clear, without that I am not able to approve it, but you can always request other people to review it. BTW, since bsd-mailx is not acively developed any more, you should be aware of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package "If you really want to maintain a deprecated package, you need to be aware that if upstream is dead, fixing release critical bugs, etc **becomes your responsibility.***" Please let me know if you have any additional question. Thanks Douglas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=U7VRFXY1UU&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review