[Bug 914936] Review Request: fes - Fast Exhaustive Search

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914936

--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5483055

$ rpmlint -i -v *
fes.src: I: checking
fes.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US boolean -> Boolean, boo lean,
boo-lean
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

fes.src: I: checking-url http://www.lifl.fr/~bouillag (timeout 10 seconds)
fes.src: I: checking-url http://www.lifl.fr/~bouillag/download/fes-0.1.spkg
(timeout 10 seconds)
fes.x86_64: I: checking
fes.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US boolean -> Boolean, boo
lean, boo-lean
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

fes.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.lifl.fr/~bouillag (timeout 10 seconds)
fes.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/libfes.so.0.0.0
The binary declares the stack as executable.  Executable stack is usually an
error as it is only needed if the code contains GCC trampolines or similar
constructs which uses code on the stack.  One common source for needlessly
executable stack cases are object files built from assembler files which don't
define a proper .note.GNU-stack section.

fes.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libfes.so.0.0.0
This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.

fes.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libfes.so.0.0.0
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a
call to ldconfig.

fes-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
fes-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.lifl.fr/~bouillag (timeout 10
seconds)
fes-devel.x86_64: I: checking
fes-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.lifl.fr/~bouillag (timeout 10
seconds)
fes.spec: I: checking-url http://www.lifl.fr/~bouillag/download/fes-0.1.spkg
(timeout 10 seconds)
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings.


The executable-stack warning needs to be investigated.

Moreover, the main package is missing the ldconfig call:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Shared_Libraries

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=G6cKZxRnmP&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]