[Bug 227098] Review Request: plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.a7s.2jpp - Plexus Component Creator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.a7s.2jpp - Plexus Component Creator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227098


pcheung@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|pcheung@xxxxxxxxxx          |dbhole@xxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|fedora-review-              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From pcheung@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-03-12 10:34 EST -------
* run rpmlint on the binary RPMs built in mock:
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-bsh-factory-*rpm
W: plexus-bsh-factory non-standard-group Development/Java
W: plexus-bsh-factory non-standard-group Development/Java
W: plexus-bsh-factory no-documentation

[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm
jpackage-utils >= 0:1.7.2
ant
bsh
classworlds
plexus-container-default
plexus-utils
java-gcj-compat-devel
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm
(none)[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-develox86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7.
plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm
plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
bsh-factory-1.0.jar.so()(64bit)
config(plexus-bsh-factory) = 0:1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7
plexus-bsh-factory = 0:1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
bsh
classworlds
config(plexus-bsh-factory) = 0:1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7
java-gcj-compat
java-gcj-compat
jpackage-utils >= 0:1.7.2
jpackage-utils >= 0:1.7.2
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
plexus-container-default
plexus-utils
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-bsh-factory-debuginfo-1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
[pcheung@to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-bsh-factory-debuginfo-1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
bsh-factory-1.0.jar.so.debug()(64bit)
plexus-bsh-factory-debuginfo = 0:1.0-0.1.a7s.2jpp.1.fc7

APPROVED.

In the future when fixing defining gcj_support to 1, the if condition should
probably be before the  the %post[,un] so that there won't be an empty %post[,un].


Reassigning to you to be built in brew.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]