[Bug 841239] Review Request: sugar-story - an activity that uses images to prompt the learner to tell stories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841239

--- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Danishka, here is a official review

+ Package builds in mock successfully

- rpmlint on rpms gave
sugar-story.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 9-3 ['9-4.fc19', '9-4']
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm tarball: 105bc01477d3dbfc157f0e49c913106f8a7f70d4f82aea5db64875b89b678fa9
upstream
tarball:105bc01477d3dbfc157f0e49c913106f8a7f70d4f82aea5db64875b89b678fa9

- License tag is GPLv3 which is not completely valid.

+ Rest looks as per packaging guidelines.


Suggestions:
1) Remove the following line from %prep. I see latest upstream release nah.po
is fixed.
  rm po/nah.po

2) License tag should be GPLv3+ and MIT. 
Read
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#.22or_later_version.22_licenses

Also, Add a comment above license tag 
# grecord.py and sprites.py is in MIT and all other files in GPLv3+

3) You may want to have release tag number 3 and not 4 for last update. But now
when you will fix above issue 1 by adding changelog, rpmlint warning will go
away.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1gOJxFsJJu&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]