Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231746 ------- Additional Comments From limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-12 08:09 EST ------- I'd like to avoid Conflicts as well, and honestly I think it'd be better to keep the text/curses binary called ettercap, and rename the gtk version, since 9/10 users will be calling it from the .desktop anyway. If the GIMP maintainers renamed the main binary to fluffybunnyfeet, very few would notice. I'm also somewhat loathe to depart from upstream unless really necessary. While I like the Busybox-esqe patch to handing the inferface flag issue, would this not confuse existing ettercap users? The patch appears only to add the new functionality, and not break the existing arg handling. IF this is correct, then I see no issue. Are we looking at a consensus around a 3-package plan, with symlinks, the above patch, and Provides instead of Obsoletes? If so, I'll get on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review