https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970009 --- Comment #27 from David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #26) > > In fact, I'd much rather see pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0) and it doesn't look > > particularly hard, but neither of those observations make it a review > > failure. > > Looking into it, is not my domain of expertise and could be good for > learning on something simple like this gui. > > I will post something here before asking for fedora-cvs?. No, go ahead and ship it as-is, matching the upstream release. We can update to gtk3 later, when there's an upstream release that does so. FWIW I think there's only one build *failure*; the rest is just warnings about using deprecated gtk functions that do still work anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zHbWcoJeWZ&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review