Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231746 ------- Additional Comments From opensource@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-12 06:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Wouldn't it be enough to install the binaries with different names (say > tettercap + ettercap -- as ethereal used to be packaged, or ettercap + > ettercap-gui) so that to avoid the need to make the text-only and the gtk > version conflict with each other ? What is the advantage of this? The ettercap-gtk package includes all the features, the ettercap package includes. So there is no need to install both binaries. > I guess the help file could be left as it was > and included in the -common part... Of course the ettercap-gtk should pull in > the needed deps. Imho the help should be as accurate as possible. Do you mean only not to change the manpage or also the commandline help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review