[Bug 231746] Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231746





------- Additional Comments From opensource@xxxxxxxxx  2007-03-12 06:02 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Wouldn't it be enough to install the binaries with different names (say
> tettercap + ettercap -- as ethereal used to be packaged, or ettercap +
> ettercap-gui) so that to avoid the need to make the text-only and the gtk
> version conflict with each other ? 

What is the advantage of this? The ettercap-gtk package includes all the
features, the ettercap package includes. So there is no need to install both
binaries.

> I guess the help file could be left as it was
> and included in the -common part... Of course the ettercap-gtk should pull in
> the needed deps.

Imho the help should be as accurate as possible. Do you mean only not to change
the manpage or also the commandline help?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]