https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970213 Jakub Filak <jfilak@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfilak@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Jakub Filak <jfilak@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The package produces unowned directories: $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyfros/plugins file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyfros/plugins is not owned by any package Adding these lines to the spec file would help: %dir %{python_sitelib}/pyfros %dir %{python_sitelib}/pyfros/plugins %dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py2.7.egg-info But you can achieve this goal in various ways: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Byte_compiling rpmlint found these relevant issues: fros.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) screencasting -> screen casting, screen-casting, screenwriting fros.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pluggable -> plug gable, plug-gable, plugged fros.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backends -> back ends, back-ends, backhands fros.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US screencasting -> screen casting, screen-casting, screenwriting fros.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pluggable -> plug gable, plug-gable, plugged fros.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backends -> back ends, back-ends, backhands fros.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fros I'm not a linguist but I would say that spelling errors should be fixed (packaging guidelines requires American English). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#summary Please consider adding a man page for fros binary. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Man_pages Regards Jakub -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yXXvJ0wJ3O&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review