[Bug 969992] Review Request: jastow - Jasper fork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969992

Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
I'm not doing formal review (yet), just adding my comment.

1) Why don'y you use downloadable tarball? Github can generate tarballs for
every tag, commit or branch, for example:
http://github.com/undertow-io/jastow/archive/1.0.0.Alpha1.tar.gz
Using downloadable tarball would ease maintenance, but also review (as I won't
have to recreate the tarbal manually - automated tools can review sources if
full tarball URL is given).

2) Explicit package requires are usually unneeded if you are using
%mvn_build/%mvn_install. Did you check automatically generated package
requires? They should be correct and complete. If not then you may have a bug
in the POM file (missing dep) or there might be a bug in XMvn, in which case I
would like to hear that. In either case you most likely can remove explicit
Requires.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hYTsONkzC1&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]